A twelve-month fellowship built around real responsibility rather than workshops — each fellow leads an actual project, with a mentor, and feedback that arrives in days rather than quarters.
- Length
- 12 months
- Format
- One real project, one mentor
- Commitment
- Monthly sessions plus project work
- Applications
- [SET A DATE, or "Opening soon"]
Twelve months of leading something real, with a mentor and fast feedback. Not a workshop series.
The problem with leadership training.
Ask anyone what they remember from a leadership workshop and most will name the venue before they name an idea.
That is not a failure of content. It is the assumption underneath the format: that leadership is a body of knowledge, and that transferring the knowledge produces the leader. It does not. Leadership is a practice, and practices are not learned by being told about them.
How this is built instead
Each fellow holds real responsibility. Not a case study — a project with their name on it, that could genuinely go wrong, in their own organisation, community or venture. Responsibility held slightly before someone feels ready is where most growth happens.
Feedback arrives in days, from someone who saw it. “You let that meeting run twenty minutes past the point of decision, and two people stopped contributing” teaches something. An annual review is a historical document.
Each fellow has someone to think out loud with. Not an instructor — someone a few steps ahead who has made the same mistakes and will say so.
It runs long enough to be wrong and recover. A full cycle of attempt, failure, adjustment and second attempt is the unit of development, and it does not fit in a quarter.
Ethics is not a module
Nobody fails an ethical test because they did not know the principle. They fail because the right thing was expensive, or unpopular, or would have embarrassed someone senior.
That willingness is built the same way as everything else — by having been in a smaller version of the situation, having chosen correctly, and having survived it. So it is practised here too, in situations where the stakes are real but not ruinous.
A programme that builds competence without this produces capable people who are not yet trustworthy. That is worse than building neither.
Who it is for
People already carrying some responsibility who want to carry more, and who can commit for a year. We would rather take a small number seriously than process a large number.
Interested in the next cohort, or in hosting a fellow?
See how it works